Assassin’s Creed: Origins is the most realistic part of the franchise!… or not?

Before starting, I want to say thanks for the support of the previous blog in realism in Assassin’s Creed, I’m a new person here and this means a lot for me! I hope this blog will not be waiting. By Odyssey and Valhalla, who will be interested, I ask the links)

Studio Ubisoft so proud of historical research that is carried out in every game, which even added to Assassin’s Creed: Origins mode“Interactive tour”, so that lovers of history have the opportunity to explore Ptolemyevsky Egypt and learn about his miracles and personalities without the need to kill or steal. In any case, this is much more interesting than many hours of documentary)

However, this is still a game, how exactly it is actually? According to Harvard Egyptologist Der Manulyana, This The most historically reliable part of the series and one of the most realistic games at all. The professor even made an assessment in History Respawned – the show that asks historians to analyze video games and evaluate their reliability.

Those who love this part of the series are better to follow the link and listen (read) as historians praise it in every possible way, but for me Origins remains unremarkable, so there will be both praises and stones in the Ubisoft garden.

Before the start of the analysis itself, it is worth saying that this is really one of the most worked out games in the historical aspect, but … is everything as good as the professor says?)

Let’s first consider several examples, because of which the game is called one of the most reliable, and then we will move on to its jambs and inaccuracies.

1. Ruin

It would seem that many films in ancient Greece are historians, and even “Sofa historians”, They spit with the words that the architecture was a whole and why the Parthenon is already similar to ruins if it was only erected?!

Based on this logic Ruin in Origins NO PLACE And many fans thought that this was an omission on the part of the developers, since all the buildings at that time were new.

However, given the numerous expansions and deviations in the history of Egypt, far from a small part of the buildings and entire regions were abandoned or destroyed. Even if political/ideological leaders settled in a new place, then there is no time Outstanding cities became forgotten, Since the population and money moved after the leader. It is also worth considering that most of the structures were from non -durable materials (in the next paragraph a little more detailed), therefore For a couple of decades of desolation, they could well become ruins.

2. And immediately 3. – Architecture and sculpture

Architecture, presented in Assassin’s Creed: Origins, TRadiorally for the series is accurately displayed. For example, in Egyptian villages, most of the houses were really built from Samana (clay+dirt (not rarely manure)+straw and other shoots), since the usual one for the same Greece even rather rich inhabitants could not afford marble, And clay and dirt are not durable, but free. Even the ancient Egyptians built palaces from short -lived materials: mainly from clay, unbroken brick and wood, at best – from sandstone.

Of course, there are questions to the scale and multi -storey, because they usually had one level at home and were quite small even in large cities, but the game in this regard I emblaced a little and diversified reality, Especially if you remember Alexandria.

As for sculptures and statues, That, perhaps, is one of the most accurate details in the whole game. For example, Alexandria Serapum Contains many recreated sculptures from modern museums, and what is a fairly high level.

What pleased me personally as 1redcasino.uk a culturalist is Image of sculptures in clothes and painted in realistic colors. After all, this is historically reliable, since today’s plain statues are the result of aging and decomposition of organic dyes of antiquity, then they were all bright and as close as possible to realism.

4. Clothing NPC

Although The clothes of the assassins and royal people are not entirely accurate, However, the clothes that are more common NPC definitely corresponds to reality. In ancient times, in Egypt, the canvas was made of flax and could be used to create modest burlap or in the process of fine processing – in a clean canvas, which was worn by representatives of the highest class.

To run barefoot was a common thing, Despite the existence of sandals, and accessories were bright jewelry of shells, beads and precious stones intended for richer members of society. Even Straw hats with wide fields are realistic, Since they were brought by the Greeks and were actively used in those days.

5. Religion

The game shows perfectly how much Religion is important for both the Egyptians and the Greeks In those days. Spiritual leaders had a huge weight in society and were on the same level with the political tops.

Tourism or interactive is largely rotated around temples, as it really was, and the mummified cats put up for sale were indeed an ordinary part of an ancient society, given their significance in the Egyptian religion.

Based on these four and a half facts, we can say that Ubisoft finally made a game on history. They approached the creation really thoroughly, but now it is worth considering a similar list, but which throws a small stone in the garden of the studio.

In fact, let’s start with a rather obvious and not terrible jamb.

1. and 2. There: weapons and armor

As for weapons, then this is a slightly complicated topic, since Assassin’s Creed Origins includes many types of weapons that could be present at that time. However, military bows shooting a lot of arrows, heavy blades above a person and intricately decorated weapons with jewelry on the handle (except ritual) is what is what is what which certainly could not exist In Egypt in ancient times. It was probably a design choice to make the game interesting.

If the main character had used throughout the game Khopesh, a small combat ax or a rather primitive spear, then not a single historian would say a word, but it would look boring enough.

A couple of words relative Armor: Soldiers in the game are portrayed in chain -off armor or in large iron cuirasses, and this Just absurd. These types of armor have already existed and used, but Just not in the heat of Egypt, Instead, the soldiers wore flaxseed cuirasses with linen skirts (military belts Cingulum), most of their protection was reduced to the shields. Elite warriors and chariot riders could afford scaly light armor on a leather basis, no more.That’s why, Most of the armor in the game is also a fiction of designers.
Of course, you can find quite a few options for copper kiras, if you google the Egyptian warriors, but this is only an exception and for the most part a ritual attribute. Usually everything was reduced to the analogues of the light torax or something like that.

3. Cleopatra’s concern

From harmless design fantasy, we move on to rather serious remarks:

In the game Cleopatra is perceived as a slutty woman, who sleeps with men at a whim. For example, in the scene where she offers to sleep with any of the men present, if he was ready to be executed the next day.

In fact, Cleopatra was much more restrained in sexual life. In fact, the intimate life of many outstanding women like her was considered an important tool for achieving power and unions, Therefore, they saved their “honor” to politically favorable moments. Many historians believe that the myth of the licentiousness of Cleopatra was actually propagandaCaesar for political purposes. A lot of controversial can be said about Cleopatra, but She certainly does not look like this abnormal game.

4. Ala gladiator battles

At its core, this is the result of common myths and, most likely, was chosen by the developers to make the game more interesting. Arena Crocodilopolis and Kiren allow the player to participate in bloody battles for gold and glory in the gladiatorial style.

In fact, these Deadly battles were more inherent in Rome for Rome,although even in this case are quite embellished. Both Greece and Egypt preferred much less bloody competitions, By the type of boxing, archery or spear throwing. In fact, today’s Olympic Games based on the manifestations of athletism athletes of Greece and Egypt.

The Egyptians were cruel and ferocious warriors, but rather peaceful outside the battles (in any case, by the standards of that time)

5. Where without racial discrimination?!

This The most absurd historical inaccuracy, which I don’t even know how to explain ..

Racial hostility and tension between elite Greeks and modest Egyptians, read -read, absolutely not a real display of history. Of course, there were some disagreements on an ethnic basis, but Mighty empires, on the contrary, often adopted certain aspects of other cultures, so that these people better accept them.

For example, Greece citizens, as you know, gave their children Egyptian names, And the Egyptians were frequent consumers of Greek products. Both cultures accepted the gods and religious customs of each other, either glorifying them separately, or somehow connecting them together (especially Greeks were flexible in religiously).

Image Greek elites and submissive Egyptians Also, it was not true, the Greeks for the majority were ordinary farmers, and many Egyptian “nobles” had power over them.

Based on all of the above, we can conclude that The studio worked well the historical part of Origins and finding significant inconsistencies was more difficult than in the previous parts of the series, however It remains a game And it would be simply impossible to do without imagination, because the game would drown in monotony and boredom.

… although why was it possible to come up with racial discrimination I certainly not understand))

The plans for the near future make a similar topic about Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, it would not be very possible to accommodate both games, they are clearly the most previous parts of the series.

Thank you for your attention and I will be glad to see your reaction)